INFORMING AND GUIDING YOU THROUGH THE PROCESS CONTACT ME TODAY
Close up report paper stacking of office working document

Fraud: Misrepresentation or Omission in Required Disclosures

William B. Hanley, Attorney At Law Oct. 30, 2024

In today's competitive business landscape, transparency is not just a virtue—it's a mandate. When doing business with other parties, understanding the intricacies of required disclosures is paramount for maintaining integrity and compliance. However, the lines can blur, and when they do, misrepresentation or omission in required disclosures can have serious consequences. 

For businesses, facing a claim of misrepresentation or omission or falling victim to fraudulent disclosures can be daunting. William B. Hanley, Attorney at Law, has dedicated his entire career to representing clients in business litigation, commercial litigation, unfair competition, shareholder disputes, breach of contract, and other business law matters.

With the legal guidance of Attorney William B. Hanley, you can mitigate risks, make sure your business operates within the bounds of the law, and help ensure that other parties adhere to disclosure requirements when dealing with your business.  

What Are Required Disclosures? 

Required disclosures are legally mandated communications that businesses must provide to stakeholders, such as investors, customers, or regulatory bodies. These disclosures are designed to ensure transparency and foster trust by revealing pertinent information about a business's financial health, operations, and prospects. They can cover a wide range of areas, from financial statements and risk factors to material contracts and legal proceedings.  

Why Do Required Disclosures Matter?

The purpose of these disclosures is to equip stakeholders with the necessary information to make informed decisions. Whether it's investing in a company or purchasing a product, the principle of full disclosure is meant to protect all parties involved. Failure to provide complete and accurate information can lead to legal challenges and reputational damage.  

Business owners should stay on top of required disclosures. Regulations can vary by industry and jurisdiction, so it may be necessary to work with an experienced business law attorney to understand the specific requirements applicable to your business.  

Difference Between Misrepresentation and Omission 

Misrepresentation and omission are two sides of the same coin when it comes to fraudulent disclosures. Generally:

  • Misrepresentation involves providing false or misleading information. Misrepresentation is often more blatant, involving the deliberate inclusion of incorrect details. This could be inflating earnings figures or downplaying risks in financial disclosures. 

  • Omission refers to the failure to include necessary information. Omission might seem less obvious but is equally harmful as misrepresentation. It involves leaving out critical information that could impact a stakeholder's understanding of the business's situation. 

Both can be detrimental to the decision-making process of stakeholders who rely on accurate and complete information. Understanding the distinction between the two is important for legal purposes, as the remedies and defenses available can differ.

Whether you suspect misrepresentation or omission in required disclosures when dealing with another party or have been accused of it, you might want to contact an attorney for legal counsel.  

Examples of Misrepresentation and Omission in Required Disclosures 

To give you a better understanding of what constitutes misrepresentation and omission in required disclosures, let’s review an example of each:  

  • Misrepresentation: Consider a scenario where a company knowingly misrepresents its revenue figures to appear more profitable than it is. This misrepresentation attracts investors, but later, when the truth unfolds, it leads to financial losses and legal actions. Such an example illustrates the potential fallout from misrepresentation in required disclosures. 

  • Omission: On the flip side, omission could occur when a business fails to disclose pending litigation that could dramatically affect its financial standing. Investors, unaware of this critical detail, may invest under false pretenses, resulting in financial harm when the litigation's impact becomes apparent. 

Both scenarios underscore the importance of accuracy and completeness in business disclosures. Missteps, whether intentional or accidental, can have far-reaching consequences. William B. Hanley, Attorney at Law, advises clients on how to adhere to disclosure requirements in all their business dealings and also helps recognize signs of misrepresentation and omission.  

How to Prove Misrepresentation and Omission in Required Disclosures? 

Proving misrepresentation or omission requires a thorough investigation and presentation of evidence. The wronged party must prove the following:  

  1. That the business had a duty to disclose information

  1. That the information was misleading or incomplete

  1. That the misrepresentation or omission led to damages

Evidence might include financial records, communications, and testimonies that highlight discrepancies or omissions. It's also essential to establish that the business acted knowingly or recklessly in its disclosures.  

Legal proceedings can be complex, requiring expertise in both the legal and business realms to effectively present evidence and argue the case. The goal is to achieve a resolution that compensates the wronged party for their losses. William B. Hanley, Attorney at Law, represents both the wronged party and the accused party in such cases.  

Recoverable Damages in Misrepresentation and Omission Cases 

In cases of fraud through misrepresentation or omission, the wronged party may be entitled to various forms of compensation. Recoverable damages can include but are not limited to:  

  • Financial losses 

  • Lost profits 

  • Punitive damages in cases of egregious conduct 

Under California Civil Code § 3294, a plaintiff (the wronged party) in litigation can obtain punitive damages when there is evidence that the defendant (the sued party) engaged in fraudulent, malicious, or oppressive conduct.  

Calculating these damages requires a detailed analysis of the impact the fraudulent disclosure had on the stakeholder. This might involve reviewing investment returns, market conditions, and the overall financial landscape at the time of the disclosure.  

Discuss Your Case in a Consultation 

If you are a business owner, you cannot sacrifice vigilance in disclosure practices. In the world of business, where trust is a valuable currency, maintaining transparent and accurate disclosures is not just a legal obligation but a strategic imperative. Missteps, whether through misrepresentation or omission, can lead to unwanted legal and financial repercussions.

Whether you are being accused of misrepresentation or omission in required disclosures or are dealing with the other party’s fraudulent disclosure, William B. Hanley, Attorney At Law, can review your particular situation and advise you on your best course of action. Request a consultation today.